Comments on: Why the Grammys suck–and the winners

By: Why Winners should Have Been Someone else

Why Winners should Have Been Someone else — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:00:18 +0000

Yeah Raidiohead may be good but COLDPLAY IS THE BEST. You have your opinion and I have mine. This is a free country and i can like whoever i want and you can like whoever you want. I like Coldplay and you like Radiohed, they are both gr8

By: Rip

Rip — Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:56:32 +0000

Please give a break!! This coldplay album suck’s!!
Radiohead in raimbows was so far superior!!

By: Why Winners should Have Been Someone else

Why Winners should Have Been Someone else — Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:17:00 +0000

i think the grammys is a good show but it’s such a ripoff that they give the award to people that nobody has heard of. I think that Coldplay really deserved that award instead of thse two old people.WE ARE IN MODERN TIMES PEOPLE! Coldplay has awesome albums, something different, something that no other artists have. Yeah probably Coldplay got the award for best song of the year; so what, they deserved it, they have great music and they work so hard to produce songs to entertain their fans. even though those two old people won, I know Coldplay has the best production and the best album of all times.The Grammys are stupid when they give the award to people who don’t deserve it. What is the point of this show then?